← The Card Shop PLT AMB Regionals 2024

Water Ravishing MillTier 1

at The Card Shop PLT AMB Regionals 2024

decks
11 (6.3% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
87 53-18-16
overall winrate
70.1%
ELO-adjusted winrate
56.1% avg ELO +2.0 per match
expected value
62.3% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
53.5% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill ↑ top
mean ELO 1412 · median 1391 · range 1169–1619 (11 pilots with an ELO rating)
941 Q1 1169 Q3 1384 1685
64% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 0% in the bottom. This deck is favored by stronger players — weight the headline winrates accordingly (the ELO-adjusted column already controls for this at the match level).
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Slimes 21.3% 20 13-4-3 72.5% 68.8% 52.7% +1.0
Wind Razorgale 13.2% 9 6-2-1 72.2% 65.4% 60.3% +4.8
Wind Allies 9.2% 12 5-4-3 54.2% 53.1% 48.3% -0.7
Water Allies 6.9% 14 9-2-3 75.0% 69.4% 57.8% +3.2
Water Penguin Mill 5.7% 8 5-1-2 75.0% 66.7% 60.3% +4.9
Wind Shadowstrike 4.6% 5 3-1-1 70.0% 61.1% 49.9% -0.1
Fire Luxem Assassin 4.0% 2 2-0-0 100.0% 66.7% 57.3% +7.0
Fire Aggro 3.4% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 56.2% +9.9
Fire Crux Mage 3.4% 2 0-1-1 25.0% 41.7% 33.6% -15.7
Fire Slimes 3.4% 2 0-1-1 25.0% 41.7% 37.2% -12.3
Fire Exia 2.3% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 55.7% +9.1
Wind Astra Cleric 2.3% 4 2-1-1 62.5% 56.2% 56.8% +4.4
Fire Arcane 1.7% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 57.1% +11.4
Fire Crux Hybrid 1.1% 3 2-1-0 66.7% 57.1% 56.4% +4.8
Water Tera Mage 1.1% 0
Fire Crux Merlin 0.6% 0
Fire Dawn of Ashes 0.6% 0
Fire Exia Jin 0.6% 0
Fire Tera Kongming 0.6% 0
Fire Umbra Diana 0.6% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 52.9% +4.6
Water Arisanna 0.6% 0
Water Crux Mage 0.6% 0
Water Umbra Diana 0.6% 0
Wind Crux Lorraine 0.6% 0
Wind Exia 0.6% 0
Wind Kongming 0.6% 0
Wind Luxem Assassin 0.6% 0
Wind Overlord 0.6% 2 2-0-0 100.0% 66.7% 57.3% +7.0
Wind Silvie 0.6% 0
Wind Slimes 0.6% 0
Wind Umbra Diana 0.6% 0
Wind Umbra Ranger 0.6% 0
Wind Umbra Tristan 0.6% 0
Decklists · 11 from this event
Mirror Analysis

In 4 mirror matches (2 draws excluded), here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 4 mirrors is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

Losers more often ran: Frostbind.

Played more by winners

No cards correlated with winning.

Played more by losers
Frostbind
Losing decks ran 3.0 copies on average, winning decks 2.0.
Of 4 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 0, both ran the same in 1.
Show all 19 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 18 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Frostbind -0.75 0 3 1
Rippleback Terrapin +0.50 2 0 2
Tidal Lock +0.50 2 0 2
Revitalizing Cleanse +0.25 1 0 3
Glacial Evocation +0.25 1 0 3
Seaside Ringleader +0.25 1 0 3
Storm of Thorns -0.25 0 1 3
Glacial Guidance +0.25 1 0 3
Tidestone Bovine +0.25 1 0 3
Silvie, Wilds Whisperer +0.25 1 0 3
Scavenging Raccoon -0.25 0 1 0
Diffusive Block -0.25 0 1 0
Snow Fairy -0.25 0 1 0
Tonoris, Lone Mercenary -0.25 0 1 0
Freezing Hail -0.25 0 1 0
Safeguard Amulet -0.25 0 1 0
Song of Frost +0.00 1 1 2
Primordial Ritual +0.00 1 1 2
Incapacitate +0.00 1 1 0

JSON: /api/events/12998/archetypes/Water Ravishing Mill